Arcade Prehacks

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21
  1. #11
    Member Zaptres's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Do you wanna know? seriously? Are you sure? well, i live in right there. you can't see it right?
    Posts
    52
    huh? is it right?

  2. #12
    Senior Member awesomego's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    that place over there
    Posts
    323
    whats right?

  3. #13
    Member Zaptres's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Do you wanna know? seriously? Are you sure? well, i live in right there. you can't see it right?
    Posts
    52
    what? what right?

  4. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    39
    Only problem is, I still don't understand what the fuzz is about. I don't remember ever having played a game with so few available actions per session. I log on, collect my gold and elixir, build or upgrade two buildings, and that's it most of the time. Once in a while I have an army ready for a short attack, but there I just place my units around the enemy village and the battle then runs on automatic. But that seems to be awfully little gameplay compared to hours of waiting for your next building to be ready.

    I can only imagine that the people who like the game are not in it for the gameplay, but for the meta-game: Joining clans, inter-clan politics, clan warfare and the like. A bit like the board game Diplomacy or the MMORPG EVE Online, where the political interaction between real humans is a lot more interesting than the observable gameplay. But even if I had the time to invest in a long, political game, I would want that game to be a little more complicated than Clash of Clans appears to be. And in consequence I would want gameplay sessions to be longer between waiting periods.

    So I can't really understand why Clash of Clans has 4.5 million daily players. Supercell's other big hit game, Hay Day, is equally profitable, but as it is a more elaborate and less annoying version of Farmville, I can understand that more easily. But I can't understand the guy spending $7,000 a month of Clash of Clans. The fact that you *can* win the game by using money makes winning the game unattractive to me. I would like to play a strategy game, and not Clash of Bank Statements.

  5. #15
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    2
    I do, truth ii

  6. #16
    Senior Member awesomego's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    that place over there
    Posts
    323

    hehe

    i spend less than ten dollars in ingame purcheses

  7. #17
    Senior Member dagamet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Éire
    Posts
    265
    I wouldn't buy gold or diamonds in those games because its too expensive and i would rather buy a ps3 game with my money

  8. #18
    Senior Member awesomego's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    that place over there
    Posts
    323
    its gold and elexir and gems

  9. #19
    Senior Member dagamet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Éire
    Posts
    265
    Quote Originally Posted by awesomego View Post
    its gold and elexir and gems
    I'm talking about online multiplayer games in general not clash of clans

  10. #20
    Senior Member awesomego's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    that place over there
    Posts
    323
    Oh. I thought you were talking about CoC

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •